|
課程名稱 |
自然與城市
Nature and City |
|
開課學期 |
109-2 |
|
授課對象 |
工學院 建築與城鄉研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
王志弘 |
|
課號 |
BP7139 |
|
課程識別碼 |
544 M4370 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期四A,B,C(18:25~21:05) |
|
上課地點 |
工綜313 |
|
備註 |
總人數上限：15人
外系人數限制：3人 |
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1092BP7139_nature |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
David Harvey曾說：「紐約沒有任何不自然之處」，指出了大都市和自然之間相互糾葛的緊密關係，以及一種跨越自然與文化、自然與城市二分的新視野。當代城市不僅沒有遠離自然，還深刻地仰賴和衝擊了廣大的生態系，也努力在實質和象徵上納入自然的元素。無論是公園綠地、河流灘地、林木花草、昆蟲鳥類，以及作為經濟動物、寵物及實驗動物的各類走獸，乃至於水文地勢、氣候、能源和礦產等，各種被賦予「自然」地位、意義和價值的因素，支持著城市的運作，也因為捲入都市過程而不斷變化。
晚近環境主義思潮在地球暖化、臭氧層破洞、污染、沙漠化與去森林化、能源耗竭、農業危機和各種生態災害漸增的趨勢下，普遍獲得重視，並形成了各種減緩生態衝擊的法律、條約和組織，持續發展各種降低生態危害的技術、程序和產品。然而，人類的都市化持續進展，城市文明和生態自然之間的緊張，似乎不斷加劇緊繃。不過，城市乃至於人類文明並未脫離自然，而是交疊糾結在一起。我們需要一個更複雜的都市理論和環境觀點，來掌握這種複雜性，以便更好的理解當前人類社會和城市面臨的處境與危機。換言之，本課程不直接處理綠色城市和可持續城市的政策、規劃與設計議題，而是聚焦於掌握自然與城市之間的複雜關係，以及這種關係所牽涉的社會、政治與經濟過程及文化想像。 |
|
課程目標 |
據此，本課程嘗試涵蓋自然、環境及生態與城市之間關係的各種面向，包含了氣候與災害、污染與垃圾處理、動物與植物、水及能源等議題，並探討政治生態學、環境社會學、環境地理學、環境政策等領域的相關概念與研究。本課程區分為兩個主要部份：（一）在課程概論後，探討「自然」與「文化」或「社會」之間關係的理論取向、重要概念和爭辯，以環境地理學、政治生態學、環境社會學、生態馬克思主義、都市生態學等為主要領域；（二）自然與城市關係的特殊議題，例如：都市環境史、環境治理政策、能量、污染與廢棄物、災害、水、動物、植物、公園與都市農業等。 |
|
課程要求 |
■課程要求：
盡力閱讀課程材料，勇於發問，勤於出席。修習者的投入與表現，對本課程能否順利運作非常重要。本課程採取講演和討論課（seminar）並行方式，每次上課由教師講授和提示重點，並由參與者分配導讀該週的閱讀材料，每篇文章報告時間，必須控制於十五分鐘以內，盡量留時間發問和討論，探討能跟理論概念對話的經驗議題。報告者必須分發書面提要（必須包含三百字以內之摘述，主要論點和論證邏輯之說明【配合論證圖示】，以及評論和問題）。
沒有分配到當週閱讀材料導讀的同學，則需繳交針對某一篇或全部閱讀材料的讀書心得和提問，至少一頁。旁聽的同學不需要分配每周閱讀材料導讀，但必須每堂課繳交當週閱讀材料的讀書心得和提問。
本課程的設計份量，需要修課者在課堂外花費四倍以上的時間，也就是3 X 4＝12個小時，包括閱讀教材、與同學討論、撰寫摘要或讀書心得及提問的時間。
■摘要寫作要點：
書面摘要必須於首頁列明報告文獻（APA格式）、日期、報告人，先有三百字摘要，述明整篇文章的問題意識和主要論點。然後是經過消化的、條理分明的內容概述。換言之，不宜逐段摘譯，最好是整理出文中討論的主要問題，以及作者對這些問題的回答或爭辯，建議以圖表方式整理出主要的論證架構，也可以搭配一些圖片，譬如說作者照片、書影或文中提到的人物和事件圖片。如果直接引述文中語句或段落，必須以不同字體清楚標示，並加註頁碼。最後，必須針對文獻內容提出問題，或是可供延伸討論的經驗議題。
各項報告須準時繳交，遲交一天扣2分（以扣除30分為上限），惟期末作業不可遲交。繳交時間明定於各週進度中。 |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
另約時間 |
|
指定閱讀 |
各週主題與閱讀材料
□閱讀材料份量將視修課人數與狀況彈性調整。有*號文章將放置於課程網頁供同學下載，其餘材料請自行準備。
第一週 課程介紹 2/25
□閱讀材料
1.王志弘*、曾亞雯（2009.09）〈獸醫師的專業主義與倫理內涵：一個動物權利角度的探討〉。《思與言》47(3): 99-150。
2.王志弘（2013）〈戲水：人水關係的除魅與返魅〉。《休閒與社會研究》7: 21-49。*
3.王志弘、林純秀（2013）〈都市自然的治理與轉化：新北市二重疏洪道〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》92: 35-71。*
4.韓依婷、王志弘*（2013）〈臺北市立動物園的遊憩化觀視與自然化地景：動物倫理觀點的分析〉。《休閒與社會研究》8: 37-58。*
5.王志弘、黃若慈、李涵茹（2014）〈台北都會區水岸意義與功能的轉變〉。《地理學報》74: 63-86。*
6.王志弘*、李涵茹（2015）〈綠色縉紳化？台北都會區水岸住宅發展初探〉。《社會科學論叢》9(2): 31-88。*
7.李涵茹、王志弘（2016）〈構框與織網：臺灣濕地的社會生產與治理〉。《地理研究》64: 115-148。*
8.黃珩婷、王志弘*（2016）〈哪一種自然才算數？新店溪濱水菜園的解離與重組〉。《台灣社會學刊》59: 29-91。*
9.何函育、王志弘*（2017）〈殘缺的衛生現代性或適當的綠色基礎設施：新北市污水淨化型人工濕地的生產與治理〉。《城市學學刊》8(1): 83-132。*
10.王志弘*、羅皓群、高郁婷（2017）〈他者的主體化與選擇性賦權：台北市動物治理的發展與困局〉。《國家發展研究》16(2): 1-42。*
11.葉文琪、王志弘*（2017）〈貓城崛起：新北市猴硐貓觀光地景形構〉。《思與言》55(3): 177-235。*
12.王志弘*、高郁婷、葉文琪（2017.10）〈從牲畜到毛孩子：臺灣報紙動物再現的劃界敘事與情感化〉。《新聞學研究》133: 43-85。
13.王志弘*、高郁婷（2017）〈都市領域化的動物皺摺：開放空間中人與動物關係的紋理〉。《地理研究》67: 1-32。*
14.王志弘*、黃若慈（2017）〈基礎設施中介的水文領域化：臺北供水治理體制的形成與轉變〉。《社會科學論叢》11(2): 1-58。*
15.王志弘*、黃若慈、何函育（2018）〈倚水成家：水中介的都市家戶多重領域化〉。《社會分析》16: 65-104。*
16.江欣樺、王志弘*、黃若慈（2018）〈水的延展都市化：坪林水源特定區的領域治理〉。《都市與計劃》45(2): 131-160。*
17.王志弘*、李涵茹（2018）〈臺北跨河橋梁的景觀化與遊憩化：多重地方意義的疊覆〉。《人文社會學報》18: 13-58。*
18.王志弘*、黃若慈（2018）〈馴化水，也要馴化人：台北市自來水生飲計畫的面子工程與技術展演〉。《文化研究》27: 159-193。*
19.Wang, Chih-hung, Yu-ting Kao* and Jo-tzu Huang (2020). Riverfront as a re-territorialising arena of urban governance: territorialisation and folding of the Xindian River in Taipei Metropolis. Urban Studies. DOI: 10.1177/0042098020911875.*
20.李蔚、王志弘*（2021）〈社區基礎設施化：新北市新店區花園新城供水爭議〉。《地理研究》73。（已接受）。
□參考材料
1.Buckingham and M. Turner (2010)《理解環境議題》（蔡依舫譯）。台北：韋伯文化。
2.Pepper, David (1996) Modern Environmentalism: An Introduction. London: Routledge.*
第二週 城市與自然概說 3/04
□閱讀材料
1.Benton-Short, Lisa and John Rennie Short (2012) 《城市與自然》（Cities and Nature）（徐苔玲、王志弘譯）。台北：群學。（原書出版於2008年）*
2.Steve, Hinchliffe (2009)〈城市與自然：親密的陌生人〉，收於John Allen, Doreen Massey and Michael Pryke編《騷動的城市：移動∕定著》（王志弘譯）（pp. 153-202），台北：群學。*
3.Blowers, Andrew and Kathy Pain (2009)〈無法持續的城市〉，收於Steve Pile, Christopher Brook and Gerry Mooney編《無法統馭的城市？秩序∕失序》（王志弘譯）（pp. 247-340 )，台北：群學。*
□參考材料
1.馬以工（2000）《城市生態》。台北：天培文化。
第三週 環境史；都市演化生物學 3/11
□閱讀材料
1.Blackbourn, David（2018）《征服自然：二百五十年的環境變遷與近現代德國的形成》（胡宗香譯）。新北市：衛城。
2.Schilthuizen, Menno（2020）《達爾文進城來了：新物種誕生！都次叢林如何驅動演化？》（陸維濃譯）。台北：臉譜。
□參考材料
1.池上俊一（2020）《德國不思議：從森林、山川探索德意志的文化與哀愁》（林俞萱譯）。新北市：世潮。
2.曾華璧（2011）《戰後台灣環境史－從毒油到國家公園》。台北：五南。
3.蕭新煌主編（2015）《台灣地方環境的教訓：五都四縣的大代誌》。高雄：巨流。
4.劉翠溶、畢以迪（James Beattie）主編（2018）《東亞環境、現代化與發展：環境史的視野》。台北：允晨。
5.劉翠溶（2019）《台灣環境史》。台北：台大出版中心。
第四週 氣候變遷、風險與災害；人類世 3/18
□閱讀材料
1.Giddens, Anthony (2011)《氣候變遷政治學》（The Politics of Climate Change）（黃煜文、高忠義譯）。台北：商周。（原書出版於2009年）(選讀第1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9章)
2.Pelling, Mark (2001) “Natural disasters?” In Noel Castree and Bruce Braun (eds), Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics (pp. 170-188). Oxford: Blackwell.*
3.Clark, Nigel (2011) “Quaking: the 1755 Lisbon disaster and the modern subject.” In Inhuman Nature: Sociable Life on a Dynamic Planet (pp. 81-106). London: Sage.*
4.Clark, Nigel (2011) “Hurrican Katrina and the origins of community.” In Inhuman Nature: Sociable Life on a Dynamic Planet (pp. 137-162). London: Sage.*
5.Clark, Nigel (2011) “ ‘Burning for the other’: colonial ecounters on a planet of fire.” In Inhuman Nature: Sociable Life on a Dynamic Planet (pp. 163-192). London: Sage.*
6.Lewis, L. Simon and Mark A. Maslin (2019)《人類世的誕生：從地質紀錄中反思人類與環境的關係，掌握改變未來的契機》（魏嘉儀譯）。台北：積木文化。
□參考材料
1.Hoffer, P. C. (2006) Seven Fires: The Urban Infernos that Reshaped America. Washington: Public Affairs.
2.Mesiner Rosens, C. (2003) Limits of Power: Great Fires and the Process of City Growth in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.Platt, R. (1999) Disasters and Democracy: The Politics of Extreme Events. Washington, DC: Island Press.
4.Vale, L. J. and Campanella, T. J. (eds)(2005) The Resilient City: How Modern Cities Recover From Disasters. New York: Oxford University Press.*
5.Hartman, C. and Squires, G. (eds)(2006) There is No Such Thing as a Natural Disaster. New York: Routledge.*
6.Burton, Ian, Robert W. Kates and Gilbert F. White (2010)《環境也是災害：你準備好面對了嗎？》（The Environment as Hazard）（黃朝恩等譯），台北：聯經。（原書出版於1978年）*
7.McNeill, William H.（1998）《瘟疫與人：傳染病對人類歷史的衝擊》（Plaques and Peoples）（楊玉齡譯），台北：天下文化。（原書出版於1976年）
8.Adam, Barbara (1998) Timescapes of Modernity: The Environment and Invisible Hazards. London: Routledge.*
9.Blaikie, Piers, Terry Cannon, Ian Davis and Ben Wisner (1994) At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters. London: Routledge.*
10.Strydom, Piet (2002) Risk, Environment and Society. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
11.Lash, Scott, Bronislaw Szerszynski and Brian Wynne (1996) Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. London: Sage.*
12.O'Riordan, Timothy and Jill Jager (eds) (1995) Politics of Climate Change: A European Perspective. London: Routledge.
13.Bulkeley, H. and M. Bestill (2005) Cities and Climate Change. New York: Routledge.
14.Dessler, Andrew E. and Edward A. Parson (2010) The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change: A Guide to the Debate (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.*
15.Jennifer Hadden (2015) Networks in Contention: The Divisive Politics of Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.*
16.Pelling, Mark (2003) The Vulnerability of Cities: Natural Disasters and Social Resilience. London: Earthscan.*
17.Davis, Mike (1998) Ecology of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster. New York: Vintage Books.*
18. Yosef Jabareen (2015) The Risk City: Cities Countering Climate Change: Emerging Planning Theories and Practices around the World. Dordrecht: Springer.*
19.陳正國（2012）〈英國思想界對里斯本大地震（1755）的回應〉。《台大文史哲學報》76:267-316。*
20.Poirier, Jean-Paul（2019）《里斯本1755：改變人類歷史的大地震》(翁德明)。高雄：無境文化。
21.林冠慧、張長義（2015）〈脆弱性研究的演變與當前發展〉。《地理學報》77: 49-82。*
22.盧鏡臣、周素卿、廖昱凱（2015）〈落差與接軌？從國際發展看台灣的都市氣候治理與研究〉。《都市與計劃》42(1): 7-38。*
23.范玫芳、林宗德、李河清、潘美玲、楊谷洋、駱冠宏編（2013）《風和日麗的背後：水、科技、災難》。新竹：交通大學出版社。
24.Jones, Eric C. and Arthur D. Murphy (eds.)(2009) The Political Economy of Hazards and Disasters. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.*
第五週 環境與社會理論 3/25
□閱讀材料
1.Barry, John (2007) “Twentieth-century social theory and the nonhuman world.” In Environment and Social Theory (2nd ed.)(pp. 83-118). London: Routledge.*
2.Barry, John (2007) “Right-wing reactions to the environment and environmental politics.” In Environment and Social Theory (2nd ed.)(pp. 119-153). London: Routledge.*
3.Barry, John (2007) “Left-wing reactions to the environment and environmental politics.” In Environment and Social Theory (2nd ed.)(pp. 154-182). London: Routledge.*
4.Barry, John (2007) “Gender, the nonhuman world and social thought.” In Environment and Social Theory (2nd ed.)(pp. 183-204). London: Routledge.*
5.Barry, John (2007) “Risk, environment and postmodernism.” In Environment and Social Theory (2nd ed.)(pp. 242-270). London: Routledge.*
□參考材料
一、環境社會理論通論
1.Eder, Klaus (1996) The Social Construction of Nature. London: Sage.
2.Macnaghten, Phil and John Urry (1998) Contested Natures. London: Sage.*
3.Goldblatt, David (1996) Social Theory and the Environment. Cambridge: Polity.
4.Redclift, Michael and Ted Benton (eds) (1994) Social Theory and the Global Environment. London: Routledge.*
5.Hannigan, John (1996) Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective. London: Routledge.
6.Martell, Luke (1994) Ecology and Society: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.Dickens, Peter (1992) Society and Nature: Towards a Green Social Theory. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
8.Robbins, Paul, John Hintz and Sarah A. Moore (2014) Environment and Society: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.*
二、生態女性主義∕女性與自然
1.Warren, Karen J. (ed.) (1994) Ecological Feminism. London: Routledge.
2.Merchant, Carolyn (1980) The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harpercollins.
3.Merchant, Carolyn (1989) Ecological Revolutions: Nature, Gender, and Science in New England. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
4.Merchant, Carolyn (1996) Earthcare: Women and the Environment. London: Routledge.
5.Mies, Maria and Vandana Shiva (1993) Ecofeminism. London: Zed Books.
6.Plumwood, Val (1993) Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.*
7.Diamond, Irene and Cloria Feman Orenstein (eds) (1990) Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
8.Rocheleau, Dianne, Barbara Thomas-Slayter and Esther Wangari (eds) (1996) Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experience. London: Routledge.
9.Odih, Pamela (2014) Watersheds in Marxist Ecofeminism. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.*
三、自然的文化建構與詮釋
1.Thomashow, Mitchell (1995) Ecological Identity: Becoming a Reflective Environmentalist. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
2.Simmons, I. G. (1993) Interpreting Nature: Cultural Constructions of the Environment. London: Routledge.*
3.Milton, Kay (1993) Environmentalism: The View form Anthropology. London: Routledge.
4.Descola, Philippe (ed.) (1996) Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Routledge.
5.Milton, Kay (1996) Environmentalism and Cultural Theory: Exploring the Role of Anthropology in Environmental Discourse. London: Routledge.*
6.Gold, John R. and George Revill (2004) Representing the Environment. London: Routledge.*
7.Gare, Arran E. (1995) Postmodernism and the Environmental Crisis. London: Routledge.*
8.Conley, Verena Andermatt (1997) Ecopolitics: The Environment in Poststructuralist Thought. London: Routledge.*
第六週 生態馬克思主義 4/01 學校溫書假（自修）
□閱讀材料
1.黃瑞祺、黃之棟（2005）《綠色馬克思主義》，台北：松慧文化。（選讀）
2.黃瑞祺、黃之棟（2013）《綠色馬克思主義的形塑軌跡》，新北：碩亞數碼。
3.Castree, Noel (2001) “Marxism, capitalism, and the production of nature.” In Noel Castree and Bruce Braun (eds), Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics.(pp. 189-207). Oxford: Blackwell.*
□參考材料
1.黃瑞祺、黃之棟（2005）《自然的人化與人的自然化》，台北：松慧文化。
2.Benton, T. (1996) The Greening of Marxism. New York: The Guilford Press.
3.Burkett, P. (1999) Marx and Nature: A Red and Green Perspective. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
4.Foster, J. B. (2000) Marx’s Ecology: Materialism and Nature. New York: Monthly Review Press.*
5.Foster, J. B. (2002) Ecology against Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
6.Grunndmann, R. (1991) Marxism and Ecology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7.Harvey, David (1993) “The nature of environment: The dialectics of social and environmental change.” Socialist Register, 29: 1-51.
8.Hughes, J. (1998) Ecology and Historical Materialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.*
9.O’Connor, J. R. (1998) Natural Causes: Essays in Ecological Marxism. New York: The Guilford Press.（中譯：唐正東、臧佩洪譯（2003）《自然的理由：生態馬克思主義研究》，南京：南京大學出版社。）
10.Pepper, David (1993) Eco-Socialism: From Deep Ecology to Social Justice. London: Routledge.（中譯：劉穎譯（2005）《生態社會主義：從深生態學到社會正義》，濟南：山東大學出版社。）*
11.Smith, Neil (2008) Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space. Athens: Georgia University of Georgia Press.*
12.Sarkar, Saral (1999) Eco-Socialism or Eco-Capitalism? A Critical Analysis of Humanity’s Fundamental Choices. London: Zed Books.
13.Burkett, Paul (2006) Marxism and Ecological Economics: Toward a Red and Green Political Economy. Boston: Brill.*
14.Bookchin, Murray (1987)《生態學與革命思潮》（Post-Scarcity Anarchism），台北：南方。
15.Peet, Richard & Michael Watts (eds) (2004) Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.*
16.Dickens, Peter (1996) Reconstructing Nature: Alienation, Emancipation and the Division of Labour. London: Routledge.*
17.Bookchin, Murray (1990) The Philosophy of Social Ecology: Essays on Dialectical Naturalism. Montreal: Black Rose Books.
18.Huan, Qingzhi (eds.)(2014) Eco-socialism as Politics: Rebuilding the Basis of Our Modern Civilisation. Dordrecht: Springer. *
第七週 理解自然：社會自然與自然地理 4/11
□閱讀材料
1.Hinchliffe, Steve (2009)《自然地理學：社會、環境與生態》（盧姿麟譯），台北：韋伯文化。
2.Demeritt, David (2001) “Being constructive about nature.” In Noel Castree and Bruce Braun (eds), Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics.(pp. 22-40). Oxford: Blackwell.*
3.Braun, Bruce and Joel Wainwright (2001) “Nature, poststructuralism, and politics.” In Noel Castree and Bruce Braun (eds), Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics.(pp. 41-63). Oxford: Blackwell.*
4.Gregory, Derek (2001) “Postcolonialism and the production of nature.” In Noel Castree and Bruce Braun (eds), Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics.(pp. 84-111). Oxford: Blackwell.*
5.Castree, Noel and Tom MacMillan (2001) “Dissolving dualism: actor-networks and the reimagination of nature.” In Noel Castree and Bruce Braun (eds), Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics.(pp. 208-224). Oxford: Blackwell.*
6.Castree, Noel (2014) Making Sense of Nature. London: Routledge.*【閱讀ch.2, pp. 37-68】
□參考材料
1.Castree, Noel, David Demeritt, Diana Liverman and Bruce Rhoads (eds)(2009) A Companion to Environmental Geography. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.*
2.Castree, Noel (2005) Nature. New York: Routledge.*
3.Whatmore, Sarah (2002) Hybrid Geographies: Natures, Cultures, Spaces. London: Sage.*
4.Soper, Kate (1995) What is Nature? Oxford: Blackwell.
5.Cronon, Williams (ed.)(1996) Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
6.Wilson, Alexander (1992) The Culture of Nature: North American Landscape from Disney to the Exxon Valdez. Oxford: Blackwell.
第八週 政治生態學概說（一） 4/15
□閱讀材料
1.Robbins, Paul (2012) “Political versus apolitical ecologies.” In Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 11-24). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.*
2.Robbins, Paul (2012) “A tree with deep roots.” In Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 25-48). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.*
3.Robbins, Paul (2012) “The critical tools.” In Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 49-81). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.*
4.Robbins, Paul (2012) “Political ecology emerges.” In Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 82-100). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.*
5.Bryant, Raymond L. (2001) “Political ecology: a critical agenda for change?” In Noel Castree and Bruce Braun (eds), Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics.(pp. 151-169). Oxford: Blackwell.*
□參考材料
1.Rainbow, Stephen (1993) Green Politics. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
2.Low, Nicholas and Brendan Gleeson (1998) Justice, Society and Nature: An Exploration of Political Ecology. London: Routledge.*
3.Dobson, Andrew and Paul Lucardie (eds) (1993) The Politics of Nature: Explorations in Green Political Theory. London: Routledge.*
4.Dobson, Andrew (1995) Green Political Thought: An Introduction (2nd edition). London: Routledge.
5.Rowell, Andrew (1996) Green Backlash: Global Subversion of the Environment Movement. London: Routledge.
6.Richardson, Dick and Chris Rootes (eds) (1994) The Green Challenge: The Development of Green Parties in Europe. London: Routledge.
7.Merchant, Carolyn (2005) Radical Ecology: The Search for a Livable World (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.*
8.Merchant, Carolyn (ed.) (1994) Ecology. New Jersey: Humanities Press.
9.Dryzek, John S. (1997) The Politics of Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.Lave, Rebecca, Christine Biermann, and Stuart N. Lane (eds.)(2018) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Physical Geography. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.*
第九週 政治生態學概說（二） 4/22
□閱讀材料
1.Robbins, Paul (2012) “Challenges in ecology.” In Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 103-121). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.*
2.Robbins, Paul (2012) “Challenges in social construction.” In Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 122-142). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.*
3.Robbins, Paul (2012) “Challenges in explanation.” In Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 143-154). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.*
4.Robbins, Paul (2012) “Environmental subjects and identities.” In Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 215-230). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.*
5.Robbins, Paul (2012) “Political objects and actors.” In Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 231-243). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
第十週 都市政治生態學的發展與辯論 4/29
□閱讀材料
1.Keil, Roger (2005) “Progress report—Urban political ecology.” Urban Geography, 26(7): 640-651.*
2.曾裕淇、徐進鈺（2016）〈永續發展：一個都市政治生態學的批判性視角〉。《地理學報》82: 1-25。*
3.Brand, Peter with Michael J. Thomas (2005) “Urban change and the environment: into the twenty-first century.” In Urban Environmentalism: Global Change and the Mediation of Local Conflict (pp. 1-24). London: Routledge.*
4.Brand, Peter with Michael J. Thomas (2005) “Discourse, power and the environment as urban ideology.” In Urban Environmentalism: Global Change and the Mediation of Local Conflict (pp. 82-110). London: Routledge.*
5.Heynen, Nik, Maria Kaika and Erik Swyngedouw (2006) “Urban political ecology: politicizing the production of urban natures.” In Nik Heynen, Maria Kaika and Erik Swyngedouw (eds) In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism (pp. 1-19). London: Routledge.*
6.Swyngedouw, Erik (2006) “Metabolic urbanization: The making of cyborg cities.” In Nik Heynen, Maria Kaika and Erik Swyngedouw (eds) In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism (pp. 20-39). London: Routledge.*
7.Swyngedouw, Erik and Nikolas C Heynen (2003) “Urban Political Ecology, Justice and the Politics of Scale.” Antipode, 35(5): 898-918.*
8.Lawhon, Mary, Henrik Ernstson and Jonathan Silver (2014) “Provincializing urban political ecology: Towards a situated UPE through African urbanism.” Antipode, 46(2): 497-512.*
9.Angelo, Hillary and David Wachsmuth (2014) “Urbanizing urban political ecology: A critique of methodological cityism.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1): 16-27.*
10.Holifield, Ryan (2009) “Actor-network theory as a critical approach to environmental justice: a case against synthesis with urban political ecology.” Antipode 41(4): 637-658.*
11.Newell, Joshua P. and Joshua J. Cousins (2015) “The boundaries of urban metabolism: Towards a political-industrial ecology.” Progress in Human Geography, 39(6): 702-728.*
□參考材料
1.Boone, Christopher G. and Ali Modarres (2006) City and Environment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.*
2.Roberts, Peter, Joe Ravetz and Clive George (2009) Environment and the City. London: Routledge.
3.Heynen, Nik, Maria Kaika and Erik Swyngedouw (eds) (2006) In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism. London: Routledge.*
4.Loftus, Alex (2012) Everyday Environmentalism: Creating an Urban Political Ecology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.*
5.Miller, Jessica Ty (2016) “Is urban greening for everyone: Social inclusion and exclusion along the Gowanus Canal.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 19: 285-294.*
6.Lave, Rebecca (2012) Fields and Streams: Stream Restoration, Neoliberalism, and the Future of Environmental Science. Athens, Georgia: The University of Georgia Press.*
7.Pow, C. P. (2017) “Building a harmonious society through greening: Ecological civilization and aesthetic governmentality in China.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(3): 864-883.*
8.Safransky, Sara (2014) “Greening the urban frontier: Race, property, and resettlement in Detroit.” Geoforum 56: 237-248.*
9.Zimmer, Anna (2010) “Urban political ecology: Theoretical concepts, challenges, and suggested future directions.” Erdkunde, 64(4): 343-354.*
10.Heynen, Nik (2014) “Urban political ecology I: The urban century.” Progress in Human Geography, 38(4): 598-604.*
11.Heynen, Nik (2016) “Urban political ecology II: The abolitionist century.” Progress in Human Geography, 40(6): 839-845.*
12.Rademacher, Anne (2015) “Urban political ecology.” Annual Review of Anthropology, 44: 137-52.*
第十一週 都市環境政策與自然的新自由主義化 5/06
□閱讀材料
1.Castree, Noel (2008) “Neoliberalising nature: the logics of deregulation and reregulation.” Environment and Planning A, 40: 131-152.*
2.Castree, Noel (2008) “Neoliberalising nature: processes, effects, and evaluations.” Environment and Planning A, 40: 153-173.*
3.Bakker, Karen (2010) “The limits of ‘neoliberal natures’:_Debating green neoliberalism.” Progress in Human Geography, 34(6): 715-735.*
4.Bakker, Karen (2013) “Constructing 'public' water: The World Bank, urban water supply, and the biopolitics of development.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31: 280-300.*
5.O'Reilly, Kathleen and Richa Dhanju (2012) “Hybrid drinking water governance: Community participation and ongoing neoliberal reforms in rural Rajasthan, India.” Geoforum 43: 623-633.*
6.Pearsall, Hamil (2010) “From brown to green: Assessing social vulnerability to environmental gentrification in New York City.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28: 872-886.*
7.邱啟新（2018）〈陽光下之非正式性：綠能導向違建治理之發展願景與城市管理意義〉。《地理學報》90: 27-54。*
8.邱啟新（2020）〈非正式城市之永續性修補：高雄市違章住宅轉型之空間與環境策略〉。《都市與計劃》47(2): 111-147。*
□參考材料
1.Hough, Michael (2004) Cities and Natural Process: A Basis for Sustainability (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
2.Platt, Rutherford H. et al. (eds) (1994) The Ecological City. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.
3.Doyle, Timothy and Doug McEachern（2001）《環境與政治》（Environment and Politics）（陳穎峰譯），台北；韋伯。（原書出版於1998年）
4.Cronon, William (1992) Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.*
5.Simmons, I.G. (1993) Environmental History: A Concise Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
6.Gandy, Matthew (2002) Concrete and Clay: Reworking Nature in New York City. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.*
7.Desfor, Gene and Roger Keil (2004) Nature and the City: Making Environmental Policy in Toronto and Los Angeles. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.*
8.Soderstrom, Mary (2006) Green City: People, Nature and Urban Place. Montréal, Canada: Véhicule Press.
9.Castonguay, Stéphane and Michèle Dagenais eds. (2011) Metropolitan Natures: Environmental Histories of Montreal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
10.曾華璧(2011) 《戰後台灣環境史－從毒油到國家公園》。台北市：五南。
11.林季嫻（2007）《台灣人地關係初探》。台北市：前衛。
12.Heynen, Nik, James McCarthy, Scott Prudham and Paul Robbins (eds.) (2007) Neoliberal Environments: False Promises and Unnatural Consequences. London: Routledge.*
第十二週 都市新陳代謝：物質、能量與廢棄物 5/13
□閱讀材料
1.黃書禮（2004）〈能量與都市系統〉、〈能量分析〉、〈能量、社會與都市文明〉、〈都市發展與能量變遷〉，收於《都市生態經濟與能量》，台北：詹氏書局。*
2.鄭春發、吳連賞（2011）〈高屏地區生態經濟系統演變與比較分析－以能值分析爲例〉，《城市學學刊》2(2): 57-111。*
3.黃書禮、許婉玲（2001）〈台北地區都市建設代謝作用物質流分析與能值評估〉，《都市與計劃》28(2): 187-209。*
4.李盈潔、邱浩偉、廖珮婷（2020）〈都市觀光之土地遠距連接物質流對都市永續性的影響〉，《都市與計劃》47(4): 349-373。*
5.Davies, Anna R. (2008) “Garbage and governance: An introduction.” In The Geographies of Garbage Governance: Interventions, Interactions and Outcomes (pp. 3-20). Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.*
6.Davies, Anna R. (2008) “Governance, Environmental Governance and Garbage.” In The Geographies of Garbage Governance: Interventions, Interactions and Outcomes (pp. 23-36). Hampshire, UK: Ashgate*
7.Scalan, John (2005) “Garbage and the Uncanny.” In On Garbage (pp. 154-178). London: Reaktion Books.*
8.Marvin, Simon and Will Medd (2006) “Metabolisms of obecity: Flows of fat through bodies, cities, and sewers.” Environment and Planning A, 38(2): 313-324.*
□參考材料
1.Melosi, M.V. (2001) Effluent America: Cities, Industry, Energy, and the Environment. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
2.Humphrey, Craig R. and Frederick H. Buttel (1982) Environment, Energy, and Society. Malabar, Florida: Krieger Publishing.
3.Elliott, David (2003) Energy, Society and Environment (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.*
4.Gandy, Matthew (1994) Recycling and the Politics of Urban Waste. New York: At Martin’s Press.
5.Hawkins, G. (2005) The Ethics of Waste: How We Relate to Rubbish. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
6.Strasser, S. (2000) Waste and Want: A Social History of Trash. New York: Owl Books.
7.Thompson. Michael (1979) Rubbish Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.Rathje, William and Cullen Murphy (1994)《垃圾之歌》（Rubbish!: The Archaeology of Garbage），台北：時報。
9.Moyers, Bill (1992)《世界垃圾場：有毒廢棄物的國際性流通》（胡承渝等譯），台北：人間出版社。
10.黃大祐（2013）《垃圾的倫理化？台北都會區垃圾治理與資源回收體制的轉型》，台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
第十三週 水的都市化 5/20
□閱讀材料
1張素玢（2014）《濁水溪三百年：歷史．社會．環境》。新北：衛城。
2.Swyngedouw, Erik (2004) “Hybrid waters: on water, nature and society.” In Social Power and the Urbanization of Water (pp. 7-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.*
3.Swyngedouw, Erik (2004) “The city in a glass of water: circulating water, circulating power.” In Social Power and the Urbanization of Water (pp. 27-50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.*
4.Swyngedouw, Erik (2004) “Water, power, and the Andean city: situating Guayaquil.” In Social Power and the Urbanization of Water (pp. 51-75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.*
5.Swyngedouw, Erik (2004) “The water mandarins: the contradictions of urban water provision.” In Social Power and the Urbanization of Water (pp. 116-134). Oxford: Oxford University Press.*
6.Swyngedouw, Erik (2004) “The water lords: speculators in water.” In Social Power and the Urbanization of Water (pp. 135-149). Oxford: Oxford University Press.*
7.Swyngedouw, Erik (2004) “Contested waters: rituals of resistance and water activism.” In Social Power and the Urbanization of Water (pp. 150-171). Oxford: Oxford University Press.*
8.Kaika, Maria (2005) “Awesome nature: modernizing as an archaeological project.” In City of Flows: Modernity, Nature, and the City (pp. 79-105). New York: Routledge.*
9.Kaika, Maria (2005) “Tamed nature: late 19th and early 20th century.” In City of Flows: Modernity, Nature, and the City (pp. 107-140). New York: Routledge.*
10.Kaika, Maria (2005) “Late 20th century: tamed nature as a source of crisis.” In City of Flows: Modernity, Nature, and the City (pp. 141-165). New York: Routledge.*
□參考材料
1.Bakker, Karen (2003) An Uncooperative Commodity: Privatizing Water in England and Wales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.Broich, John (2013) London: Water and the Making of the Modern City. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
3.Gandy, Matthew (2014) The Fabric of Space: Water, Modernity, and the Urban Imagination. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
4.Hallström, Jonas (2002) Constructing a Pipe-Bound City: A History of Water Supply, Sewerage, and Excreta Removal in Norrkoping and Linkoping, Sweden, 1860-1910. Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press.*
5.Kaika, Maria (2005) City of Flows: Modernity, Nature, and the City. New York: Routledge.
6.Karvonen, Andrew (2011) Politics of Urban Runroff: Nature, Technology, and the Sustainable City. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
7.Krause, Matthias (2009) The Political Economy of Water and Sanitation. New York: Routledge.
8.Linton, Jamie (2010) What is Water? The History of a Modern Abstraction. Vancouver: UBC Press.
9.Soll, David (2013) Empire of Water: An Environmental and Political History of the New York City Water Supply. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
10.White, Iain (2010) Water and the City: Risk, Resilience and Painting for a Sustainable Future. London: Routledge.
11.Bulloch, John and Adel Darwish (1994)《水的戰爭》（Water Wars）。台北：新新聞。（原書出版於1993年）
12.舒國治（2010）《水城台北》。台北：皇冠。
13.蕭新煌等著（1991）《水的關懷—河川環境與水資源保護研討會論文集》。台北：時報。
14.王志弘（1994）〈城市與河流〉。《聯合文學》115: 125-127。
15.王志弘（1996.1.29）〈水的人類學〉。《自由時報》，34版。
16.山田登世子（2001）《水的記憶之旅》（章蓓蕾譯）。台北：生智。
17.陳鴻圖（2009）《台灣水利史》。台北：五南。
18.黃若慈（2014）《惡水之爭－大高雄的自來水水質爭議與都市供水治理》。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
第十四週 都市水岸發展與再生 5/27
□閱讀材料
1.Brownill, Sue (2011) “London docklands revisited: the dynamics of waterfront development.” In Gene Desfor, Jennefer Laidley, Quentin Stevens and Dirk Schubert (eds), Transforming Urban Waterfronts: Fixity and Flow (pp. 121-142). New York: Routledge.*
2.Schaller, Susanna and Johannes Novy (2011) “New York City’s waterfront as strategic sites for analyzing neoliberalism and its contestations.” In Gene Desfor, Jennefer Laidley, Quentin Stevens and Dirk Schubert (eds), Transforming Urban Waterfronts: Fixity and Flow (pp. 166-187). New York: Routledge.*
3.Desfor, Gene (2011) “Deep water and good land: socio-nature and Toronto’s changing industrial waterfront.” In Gene Desfor, Jennefer Laidley, Quentin Stevens and Dirk Schubert (eds), Transforming Urban Waterfronts: Fixity and Flow (pp. 191-210). New York: Routledge.*
4.Stevens, Quentin (2011) “The German ‘city beach’ as a new approach to waterfront development.” In Gene Desfor, Jennefer Laidley, Quentin Stevens and Dirk Schubert (eds), Transforming Urban Waterfronts: Fixity and Flow (pp. 235-256). New York: Routledge.*
5.Taşan-Kok, Tuna and Yesim Sungu-Eryilmaz (2011) “Exploring innovative instruments for socially sustainable waterfront regeneration in Antwerp and Rotterdam.” In Gene Desfor, Jennefer Laidley, Quentin Stevens and Dirk Schubert (eds), Transforming Urban Waterfronts: Fixity and Flow (pp. 257-273). New York: Routledge.*
□參考材料
1.Malone, Patrick (ed.) (1996) City, Capital and Water. London: Routledge.
2.Brown, Peter Hendee (2009) American’s Waterfront Revival: Port Authorities and Urban Redevelopment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
3.Marshall, Richard (ed.)(2001) Waterfronts in Post-industrial Cities. London: Spon Press.*
4.Kelman, Ari (2006) A River and Its City: The Nature of Landscape in New Orleans. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.Mallet, Victor（2019）《恆河生與死：從恆河的今昔探索印度的未來》（謝濱安譯）。新北市：自由之丘。
6.Ackroyd, Peter（2020）《泰晤士：大河大城》（任明譯）。上海：上海文藝出版社。
第十五週 城市與動物 (一) 6/03
□閱讀材料
1.Philo, Chris and Chris Wilbert (eds.)(2000) Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human-animal Relations. London: Routledge.*（選讀）
2.Gillespie, Kathryn and Rosemary-Claire Collard (eds.)(2015) Critical Animal Geographies: Politics, Intersections, and Hierarchies in a Multispecies World. New York: Routledge.*（選讀）
□參考材料
1.Philo, Chris (1995) “Animals, Geography, and the City: Notes on Inclusions and Exclusion.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13: 655-681.*
2.Wolch, J. and Emel, J. (eds)(1998) Animal Geographies: Place, Politics and Identity in the Nature-Culture Borderlands. London: Verso.
3.Philo, C. and Wolch, J. (1998) “Through the geographical looking glass: space, place and human-animal relations.” Society and Animals 6: 103-118.
4.Urbanik, Julie (2012) Placing Animals: An Introduction to the Geography of Human-Animal Relations. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.*
5.Malamud, Randy (1998) Reading Zoos: Representations of Animals and Captivity. London: Macmillan.
6.Alger, Janet M. and Steven F. Alger (2003) Cat Culture: The Social World of a Cat Shelter. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
7.Beck, Alan M (1973) The Ecology of Stray Dogs; a Study of Free-ranging Urban Animals. Baltimore: York Press.
8.Like, Brian (2007) Brutal: Manhood and the Exploitation of Animals. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
9.Baker, Steve (1993) Picturing the Beast: Animals, Identity and Representation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
10.Franklin, Adrian (1999) Animals and Modern Cultures: A Sociology of Human-Animal Relations in Modernity. London: Sage.
11.Wolfe, Cary (2003) Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Pothumanist Theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
12.Torres, Bob (2007) Making a Killing: The Political Economy of Animal Rights. Oakland, CA: AK Press.
13.Bulliet, Richard W. (2005) Hunters, Herders, and Hamburgers: The Past and Future of Human-Animal Relationships. New York: Columbia University Press.
14.Simmons, Laurence and Philip Armstrong (eds)(2007) Knowing Animals. Boston: Brill.
15.Knight, John (ed.)(2005) Animals in Person: Cultural Perspectives on Human-Animal Intimacy. Oxford: Berg.
16.Caras, Roger A.（1998）《完美的和諧：動物與人的親密關係》（A Perfect Harmony: The Intertwining Lives of Animals and Humans throughout History）（陳慧雯譯），台北：天下文化。（原書出版於1996年）
17.吳蕙如（2010）《我輩貓人：流浪貓保護運動的興起與建構》，台灣大學社會學系碩士論文。
18.朱天心（2005）《獵人們》，台北：印刻。
19.劉克襄（2007）《野狗之丘》，台北：遠流。
20.韓依婷（2012）《關愛的囚籠：木柵動物園的自然化地景與觀視權力》，台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
■繳交期末報告初稿
第十六週 城市與動物 (二) 6/10
□閱讀材料
1.Wolch, J., K. West, and T.E. Gaines (1995) “Transspecies urban theory.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13: 735-760.*
2.Hovorka, Alice (2008) “Transspecies urban theory: Chickens in an African city.” Cultural Geographies 15: 95–117.*
3.Thomson, Melanie S. (2007) “Placing the wild in the city: Thinking with Melbourne's Bats.” Society and Animals 15: 79-95.*
4.Urbanik, Julie and Mary Morgan (2013) “A tale of tails: The place of dog parks in the urban imaginary.” Geoforum 44: 292-302.*
5.Buller, Henry (2014) “Animal geographies I.” Progress in Human Geography 38(2): 308-318.*
6.Buller, Henry (2015) “Animal geographies II: Method.” Progress in Human Geography 39(3): 374-384.*
7.Hovorka, Alice J. (2017) “Animal geographies I: Globalizing and decolonizing.” Progress in Human Geography 41(3) 382-394.*
8.Hovorka, Alice J. (2018) “Animal geographies II: Hybridizing.” Progress in Human Geography 42(3): 453-462.*
9.Hovorka, Alice J. (2019) “Animal geographies III: Species relations of power.” Progress in Human Geography 43(4): 749-757.*
10.Gibbs, Leah M. (2020) “Animal geographies I: Hearing the cry and extending beyond.” Progress in Human Geography 44(4): 769-777.*
第十七週 城市植物、綠地與農業 6/17
□閱讀材料
1.黃孫權（2012）《綠色推土機：九零年代台北的違建、公園、自然房地產與制度化地景》。新北市：獨立媒體。
2.黃珩婷、王志弘（2016）〈哪一種自然才算數？新店溪河濱菜園的解離與重組〉，《台灣社會學刊》59: 29-91。*
3.羅貴祥（2016）〈從海盜邦到耕作村：國家主權下香港的海岸與農地敘述〉，《文化研究》23: 127-140。*
4.Saed (2012) “Urban Farming: The right to what sort of city?” Capitalism Nature Socialism, 23(4): 1-9.*
5.Barlett, Peggy F. (2005) “Introduction.” In Peggy F. Barlett (ed.), Urban Place: Reconnecting with the Natural World (pp. 1-34). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. *
6.Stuart, Susan M. (2005) “Lifting spirits: creating gardens in California domestic violence shelters.” In Peggy F. Barlett (ed.), Urban Place: Reconnecting with the Natural World (pp. 61-88). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.*
7.von Hassell, Malve (2005) “Community gardens in New York Coty: place, community, and individuality.” In Peggy F. Barlett (ed.), Urban Place: Reconnecting with the Natural World (pp. 91-116). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press *
8.Andreatta, Susan L. (2005) “Urban connections to locally grown produce.” In Peggy F. Barlett (ed.), Urban Place: Reconnecting with the Natural World (pp. 117-140). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
9.Mastnak, Tomaz, Julia Elyachar and Tom Boellstorff (2014) “Botanical decolonization: rethinking native plants.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32: 363-380.*
10.Sandberg, L. Anders, Adrina Bardekjian and Sadia Butt (eds.) (2014) Urban Forests, Trees, and Greenspace: A Political Ecology Perspective. London: Routledge.*【閱讀Introduction (pp. 1-16)】
□參考材料
1.Low, Setha, Dana Taplin and Suzanne Scheld (2005) Rethinking Urban Parks: Public Space & Cultural Diversity. Austin: The University of Texas Press.
2.Henderson, Elizabeth and Robyn Van En (2011) 《種好菜，過好生活》（Sharing the Harvest: A Citizen’s Guide to Community Supported Agriculture）（有大林、李宜澤、呂欣怡、林震洋、許敏鳳、蔡晏霖、劉逸姿譯）。台北市：商周。
3.王珍珊（1996）《說園解植：從人與植物的關係看都市人的生活——以台北經驗為例》，台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
4.孟磊、江慧儀（2011）《向大自然學設計：樸門Permaculture啟發綠生活的無限可能》，台北：新自然主義。
5.蔡珠兒（1995）《花叢腹語》，台北：聯合文學。
6.李清志、黃宏輝（1995）〈神奇的都市魔幻藥—花與都市的互動〉，收於林芳怡編《空間啄木鳥：都市另類空間文化解讀》（pp. 102-107），台北：創興。
7.唐芩（2009）《自己種菜吃：都市中的療癒菜園》，台北：腳ㄚ文化。
8.黃盛璘（2007）《走進園藝治療的世界》，台北：心靈工坊。
9.李涵茹（2013）《都市自然景觀化－台北市草坪的綠色治理術》，台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
10.黃珩婷（2014）《哪一種「自然」才算數？新店溪永和段農耕地景的興衰》，台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
11.Alkon, Alison Hope (2012) Black, White, and Green: Farmers Markets, Race, and the Green Economy. Athens, Georgia: The University of Georgia Press.*
12.Lawrence, H. W. (2008) City Trees: A Historical Geography from the Renaissance through the Nineteenth Century. University of Virginia Press.
13.Stroud, E. (2012) Nature Next Door: Cities and Trees in the American Northeast. University of Washington Press.
14.Jonnes, J. (2016) Urban Forests: A Natural History of Trees and People in the American Cityscape. Penguin Books.
15. Dümpelmann, S. (2019) Seeing Trees: A History of Street Trees in New York City and Berlin. Yale University Press.
第十八週 期末報告發表會 6/24
□修課同學製作簡報檔，於課堂上發表期末報告成果，每人12分鐘。
|
|
參考書目 |
1.Benton-Short, Lisa and John Rennie Short (2008) Cities and Nature. London: Routledge.（中譯：徐苔玲、王志弘譯（2012）《城市與自然》。台北：群學。）
2.Blackbourn, David（2018）《征服自然二百五十年的環境變遷與近現代德國的形成》（胡宗香譯）。新北：衛城。
3.Hinchliffe, Steve (2009)《自然地理學：社會、環境與生態》（盧姿麟譯），台北：韋伯文化。
4.Robbins, Paul (2012) Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.) West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
5.Barry, John (2007) Environment and Social Theory (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
6.Castree, Noel and Bruce Braun (eds)(2001) Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics. Oxford: Blackwell.
7.Castree, Noel (2014) Making Sense of Nature. London: Routledge.
8.Loftus, Alex (2012) Everyday Environmentalism: Creating an Urban Political Ecology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.Holifield, Ryan, Michael Porter, and Gordon Walker (eds)(2010) Spaces of Environmental Justice. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
10.Darier, Éric (ed.)(1999) Discourses of the Environment. Oxford: Blackwell.
11.Brand, Peter and Michael J. Thomas (2005) Urban Environmentalism: Global Change and the Mediation of Local Conflict. London: Routledge.
12.Desfor, Gene and Roger Keit (2004) Nature and the City: Making Environmental Policy in Toronto and Los Angeles. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
13.Davies, Anna R. (2008) The Geographies of Garbage Governance: Interventions, Interactions and Outcomes. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
14.Swyngedouw, Erik (2004) Social Power and the Urbanization of Water. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.Kaika, Maria (2005) City of Flows: Modernity, Nature, and the City. New York: Routledge.
16.Desfor, Gene, Jennefer Laidley, Quentin Stevens and Dirk Schubert (eds)(2011) Transforming Urban Waterfronts: Fixty and Flow. New York: Routledge.
17.Clark, Nigel (2011) Inhuman Nature: Sociable Life on a Dynamic Planet. London: Sage.
18.Philo, Chris and Chris Wilbert (eds)(2000) Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human-animal Relations. London: Routledge.
19.Gandy, Matthew (2002) Concrete and Clay: Reworking Nature in New York City. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
「城市自然與人類互動」調查報告 |
20% |
選擇一個你認為是城市自然的主題，針對特定城市的特定範圍（大小不拘），調查和記錄該自然主題或元素與人類之間的互動關係及重要事件（例如，某社區貓犬和居民的關係，某河濱地區的人水關係，或是颱風與城市特定地方的關係等），需搭配地圖和照片，約五千字，佔20%。 |
2. |
期末報告 |
30% |
運用本學期提到的觀念和議題，撰寫針對自然與城市之關係的經驗研究論文一篇。學期中先繳交計畫書三頁以內（8%），此後分兩階段繳交研究成果，期末報告初稿經教師批改後，於期末繳交完整論文，規格和排版必須符合學術要求，可參照《台灣社會學刊》或《台灣社會學》格式。完稿必須包含中英文題目、中文摘要和關鍵詞等項目，字數以一萬五千字至兩萬字為度。初稿佔12%，完稿佔10%。期末作業可以是期中作業的延伸。最後一週上課時，修課同學需準備簡報檔，於課堂上發表期末報告成果。合計佔30%。 |
3. |
平時表現 |
50% |
含出席狀況、參與討論、口頭報告和書面摘要表現等，佔50 %。 |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
2/25 |
課程介紹 |
|
第2週 |
3/04 |
城市與自然概說 |
|
第3週 |
3/11 |
環境史；都市演化生物學 |
|
第4週 |
3/18 |
氣候變遷、風險與災害；人類世 |
|
第5週 |
3/25 |
環境與社會理論 |
|
第6週 |
4/01 |
生態馬克思主義（學校溫書假（自修）） |
|
第7週 |
4/08 |
理解自然：社會自然（social nature）與自然地理 |
|
第8週 |
4/15 |
政治生態學概說（一）（繳交期末報告計畫書） |
|
第9週 |
4/22 |
政治生態學概說（二） |
|
第10週 |
4/29 |
都市政治生態學的發展與辯論 |
|
第11週 |
5/06 |
都市環境政策與自然的新自由主義化（繳交期中作業（都市自然與人類的互動）） |
|
第12週 |
5/13 |
都市新陳代謝：物質、能量與廢棄物 |
|
第13週 |
5/20 |
水的都市化 |
|
第14週 |
5/27 |
都市水岸發展與再生（繳交期末報告初稿） |
|
第15週 |
6/03 |
城市動物（一） |
|
第16週 |
6/10 |
城市動物（二） |
|
第17週 |
6/17 |
城市植物、綠地與農業 |
|
第18週 |
6/24 |
期末報告發表會 |
|